Skip to content

Conversation

@vvolkgang
Copy link
Member

🎟️ Tracking

N/A

📔 Objective

Change the SDK Update PR title to align with the Android repo. Currently:

image

⏰ Reminders before review

  • Contributor guidelines followed
  • All formatters and local linters executed and passed
  • Written new unit and / or integration tests where applicable
  • Protected functional changes with optionality (feature flags)
  • Used internationalization (i18n) for all UI strings
  • CI builds passed
  • Communicated to DevOps any deployment requirements
  • Updated any necessary documentation (Confluence, contributing docs) or informed the documentation team

🦮 Reviewer guidelines

  • 👍 (:+1:) or similar for great changes
  • 📝 (:memo:) or ℹ️ (:information_source:) for notes or general info
  • ❓ (:question:) for questions
  • 🤔 (:thinking:) or 💭 (:thought_balloon:) for more open inquiry that's not quite a confirmed issue and could potentially benefit from discussion
  • 🎨 (:art:) for suggestions / improvements
  • ❌ (:x:) or ⚠️ (:warning:) for more significant problems or concerns needing attention
  • 🌱 (:seedling:) or ♻️ (:recycle:) for future improvements or indications of technical debt
  • ⛏ (:pick:) for minor or nitpick changes

@vvolkgang vvolkgang requested a review from a team as a code owner November 4, 2025 19:43
@vvolkgang vvolkgang enabled auto-merge (squash) November 4, 2025 19:44
@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Nov 4, 2025

Claude finished @vvolkgang's task —— View job


Code Review Complete

PR Title & Description Evaluation

💭 The PR title "Align SDK Update PR title with Android repo" is clear and specific. The objective effectively explains the change with a helpful screenshot showing the inconsistency being fixed. Well done.

Summary of Changes

This PR standardizes the SDK update PR title format to match the Android repository by changing from gerund form ("Updating"/"Downgrading") to imperative form ("Update"/"Downgrade") in .github/workflows/sdlc-sdk-update.yml:211,216.

Findings

No findings - the changes are correct and align with the stated objective.

Good Practices Observed

  • Clear, focused change addressing a single consistency issue
  • Includes visual evidence (screenshot) demonstrating the problem
  • Changes are minimal and directly address the stated objective

Action Items

None - PR is ready to merge.


@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 4, 2025

Logo
Checkmarx One – Scan Summary & Details4e1b897f-eb3a-41c9-a1fc-eb951d80a567

Great job! No new security vulnerabilities introduced in this pull request

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 4, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 83.92%. Comparing base (e9c7a5c) to head (38202bb).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2099      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   85.40%   83.92%   -1.48%     
==========================================
  Files        1721     1977     +256     
  Lines      145463   160793   +15330     
==========================================
+ Hits       124226   134952   +10726     
- Misses      21237    25841    +4604     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@vvolkgang vvolkgang merged commit 0bebf57 into main Nov 17, 2025
15 checks passed
@vvolkgang vvolkgang deleted the vvolkgang/fix-sdk-update-title branch November 17, 2025 16:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants